Two of the objectives of point 4.3 are to ensure that law firm clients are able to make informed decisions about their legal options and the costs associated with pursuing those options; and to ensure that the law firm does not charge more than fair and reasonable amounts for legal work. The disclosure must be in writing and expressed in plain language: subsection 179(1). Disclosure may be made separately or in a cost agreement or in a general reservation: Article 179 (2). There are increasing exceptions to the disclosure requirement. Most of the disclosure requirements of § 175(2) are self-explanatory. However, the term “billing terms” is not defined. In the committees dealing with the bill, this expression was generally understood to mean that the frequency of sending invoices and the time when these invoices had to be paid. Your client has the right to negotiate how you will charge them for costs; and you can make them a written offer as part of the cost agreement. The concept of disclosure evolved from the widespread perception that many clients were unaware of the likely cost of a case until they received an invoice from their lawyer. The profession, according to the argument, often sees clients who are in immediate difficulty and ask for services without thinking about cost or other impacts. In these circumstances, the argument continues, it is better to make the customer understand the costs and other implications at the beginning of a case rather than being involved in litigation when attempting to charge a fee for these services.
This argument was supported by a review of claims against Law Cover, which showed numerous claims caused by miscommunication during detention. `. an estimate of the total legal costs in a case, as required by paragraph 174(1)(a) of the LPUL is a reasonable approximation of the total cost that a client is likely to have to pay in the case for which directions have been given from time to time, expressed in a single digit (the estimate). The definition of the total costs of litigation in this context includes fees, contingent payments and GST, which must be reported separately, but not interest: section 6 of the LPUL. It should be noted that, where a collection contract includes a collection fee, that fee should be explained to the customer as part of the estimate of the total legal costs and the circumstances in which they would be payable. (Emphasis added). You can set a condition in your cost agreement that you will only be paid for your work if you get a positive result. An example of this is a “no gain, no fees” agreement. While the parties may agree on a cost agreement with retroactive effect, it cannot result in a law firm`s disclosure requirements being compliant.
 The authorities are united by the fact that the disclosure that takes place several months after the beginning of the retention is not in accordance with the obligation to make the disclosure “as soon as possible”.  “The provision of one or more cost estimates from time to time does not preclude a client from providing further information on the steps or stages of a matter of providing that information, and the provision of that information to a client should be encouraged. It is not inconsistent with paragraph 174(1)(a) to provide estimates for each of the steps that the question could achieve, whether the estimates of individual steps are expressed as a single number or a series of numbers, provided that legal practice, after taking into account all the circumstances and the most likely outcome, always gives the one-digit estimate of the total legal fees in this area, which requires paragraph 174(1)(a). .